Coluna / Columna v.23, n.1 /2024

O USO DO O-ARM® OU DA RADIOSCOPIA EM CIRURGIAS DA COLUNA: REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA COM META-ANÁLISE


THE USE OF THE O-ARM® OR RADIOSCOPE IN SPINE SURGERY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS


EL USO DE O-ARM® O RADIOSCOPIA EN CIRUGÍAS ESPINALES: UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA CON METAANÁLISIS


Sylvio Mistro , Jessica Yumi Matuoka , Haliton Alves de Oliveira , Priscila Mina Falsarella , Marcelo Italo Risso


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-185120242301275197



Resumo:

Array


Palavras-chave: ,,,

ABSTRACT

The great advances in using new devices and imaging systems in surgeries aim to reproduce an ideal and safe scenario for the surgeon, the team, and the patient. New systems and devices are constantly available to demonstrate and facilitate intraoperative navigation, thereby reducing errors and avoiding complications for the patient and staff. This study evaluates and compares using the O-arm® system and radioscopy in the freehand technique in spine surgeries. For this, searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase for randomized and non-randomized studies using the O-arm® system and radioscopy in spine surgery. Twenty-four studies were included and compared regarding procedure time, accuracy of implant positioning, effective radiation dose, safety, and efficacy. In one study, the O-arm® group showed a shorter surgical time when compared to the freehand technique (222.5 min. [SD=38.0] vs. 255.2 min. [SD=40.3], p=0.011, respectively). In two studies, the freehand technique resulted in a lower effective radiation dose for patients. In 12 studies, a higher incidence of complications was observed among patients undergoing surgery with the freehand technique. It was concluded that using the O-arm® is associated with a reduction in malposition of implants and more safety for instrumented procedures. Still, no evidence exists that its use can result in less surgical time.


Keywords: Dosage,Efficacy,Radiation,Safety

Resumen:

Array


Palavras-chave: ,,






Indexadores